Will science and consciousness ever meat? Complexity, symmetry and qualia

3Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Within recent discussions in the Philosophy of Mind, the nature of conscious phenomenal states or qualia (also called 'raw feels' or the feel of 'what it is like to be') has been an important focus of interest. Proponents of Mind-Body Type-Identity theories have claimed that mental states can be reduced to neurophysiological states of the brain. Others have denied that such a reduction is possible; for them, there remains an explanatory gap. In this paper, functionalist, physicalist, epiphenomenalist, and biological models of the mind are discussed and compared. Donald Davidson's Anomalous Monism is proposed as a unifying framework for a non-reductive theory of qualia and consciousness. Downward Causation, Emergence through Symmetry-breaking, and Dynamical Systems Theory are used to show how consciousness and qualia emerge from their neural substrate and can also be causally efficacious. © 2010 by the author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vergauwen, R. (2010). Will science and consciousness ever meat? Complexity, symmetry and qualia. Symmetry, 2(3), 1250–1269. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym2031250

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free