EQ-5D-5L or EQ-HWB-S: Which is the Better Instrument for Capturing Spillover Effects in Parental Carers of Children with COVID-19?

6Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: ‘Caregiver health spillovers’ refer to the broader impacts of an individual’s illness and interventions on informal caregivers’ health and well-being. This study focuses on the spillover effects experienced by parental carers of children with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), aiming to compare the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L and the experimental EQ Health and Wellbeing Short version (EQ-HWB-S) in capturing these effects. Methods: A longitudinal study was conducted with 861 parental carers of children aged 0–18 years with COVID-19 and 231 parents of healthy children as the control group. The EQ-5D-5L and EQ-HWB-S were used to assess parental health and well-being. Analyses included known-groups validity (multivariable regression), test–retest reliability (Gwet’s AC1, intraclass correlation coefficient) and responsiveness to health improvement (Glass’ Δ effect size). Results: Parents of infected children reported more problems than those of healthy controls. The EQ-HWB-S better discriminated between sub-groups defined by the child’s COVID-19 presence, caring time and work impact. Test–retest reliability was fair to good for EQ-HWB-S dimensions (Gwet’s AC1: 0.33–0.79), moderate to good for EQ-5D-5L (Gwet’s AC1: 0.40–0.76), and good for index scores and EQ VAS (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.70–0.77). Parental health and well-being improved as children recovered, with the EQ-5D-5L showing slightly higher responsiveness (effect size: 0.77–0.87) than EQ-HWB-S (effect size: 0.62–0.74). Conclusions: Both EQ-HWB-S and EQ-5D-5L are valid, reliable and responsive for measuring parental spillover effects related to a child’s COVID-19 infection. EQ-HWB-S outperformed in distinguishing social and emotional impacts of caregiving, while EQ-5D-5L better captured physical health improvements. The choice between tools may depend on study objectives.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhou, W., Ding, B., Busschbach, J., Herdman, M., Yang, Z., & Lu, Y. (2025). EQ-5D-5L or EQ-HWB-S: Which is the Better Instrument for Capturing Spillover Effects in Parental Carers of Children with COVID-19? PharmacoEconomics, 43(5), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-025-01473-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free