Sengstaken–Blakemore tube in critical upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Implications for aeromedical retrieval

Abstract

Sengstaken–Blakemore tubes (SBTs) are rarely used in Australia, because of improved access to endoscopy and interventional radiology, as well as overall lower rate of variceal haemorrhage from improvements in primary prophylaxis. SBT's use is associated with significant rate of serious complications, such as oesophageal perforation, mucosal necrosis, aspiration pneumonia and respiratory compromise secondary to external compression of the trachea. As such, SBT is currently only recommended for use in life-threatening variceal haemorrhage, where endoscopic, embolization and pharmacologic therapy have been unsuccessful or are unavailable. No data exist for its use in Australasia but one area that it could be indicated is for hemodynamically unstable patients in remote setting, where long transfer times often means delayed access to endoscopy. We present a case of SBT insertion in retrieval medicine and discuss placement in the management of an unstable upper gastrointestinal bleed, complicating factors such as lack of radiology to confirm balloon position, the impact of flight altitude on balloon pressures, the maintenance of traction in flight and logistics of long flight times across the state of Queensland. This is the first case report of SBT use in the Australian aeromedical environment. It is also the first one where SBT has been used for duodenal bleeding, although the source of bleeding was unknown prior to insertion.