Autocratic control of civil society, including academia, can be extended to democratic societies and institutions in ways that pose threats to liberal-democratic values, such as academic freedom, for example through mechanisms and practices that lead to academic self-censorship. Engaging critically with the literature on ‘sharp power’ and ‘authoritarian influencing’ addressing this phenomenon, this paper argues that democratic actors who, without sharing the repressive goals of autocracies, contribute to their success in settings of international collaboration and exchange can become structurally complicit with such wrongs. Recognizing the risk of complicity is a necessary first step towards addressing the political responsibilities resulting from it.
CITATION STYLE
Pils, E. (2021). Complicity in democratic engagement with autocratic systems. Ethics and Global Politics, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/16544951.2021.1958509
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.