Conservative versus Surgical Management of Iatrogenic Tracheal Rupture

17Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Iatrogenic tracheal rupture (ITR) represents a life-threatening condition requiring prompt diagnosis, management, and treatment. The management of ITR is challenging, and treatment options depend on tear location, size, injury extent, and the patient's respiratory status. Although this complication has been extensively reported in published literature, the best evidence practice, for the management, requires clarification. In this review, the authors focused on the establishment of a differential diagnosis and the potential mechanism of the injury, the decision-making process, and the therapeutic approaches. It is suggested that for small lacerations or stable patients, conservative management could be considered sufficient, whereas invasive surgical therapy would be more appropriate in cases of large defects with significant air leak and patient instability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Panagiotopoulos, N., Patrini, D., Barnard, M., Koletsis, E., Dougenis, D., & Lawrence, D. (2017, May 1). Conservative versus Surgical Management of Iatrogenic Tracheal Rupture. Medical Principles and Practice. S. Karger AG. https://doi.org/10.1159/000455859

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free