Hospital-Based Acute Care After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Implications for Quality Measurement

15Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Although hospital readmissions are being adopted as a quality measure after total hip or knee arthroplasty, they may fail accurately capture the patient's postdischarge experience. Methods: We studied 272,853 discharges from 517 hospitals to determine hospital emergency department (ED) visit and readmission rates. Results: The hospital-level, 30-day, risk-standardized ED visit (median = 5.6% [2.4%-13.7%]) and hospital readmission (5.0% [2.6%-9.2%]) rates were similar and varied widely. A hospital's risk-standardized ED visit rate did not correlate with its readmission rate (r = -0.03, P = .50). If ED visits were included in a broader "readmission" measure, 246 (47.6%) hospitals would change perceived performance groups. Conclusion: Including ED visits in a broader, hospital-based, acute care measure may be warranted to better describe postdischarge health care utilization.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Trimba, R., Laughlin, R. T., Krishnamurthy, A., Ross, J. S., & Fox, J. P. (2016). Hospital-Based Acute Care After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Implications for Quality Measurement. Journal of Arthroplasty, 31(3), 573-578.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.10.019

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free