Developing a rapid diagnosis and treatment centre: Estimating impact on hospital resources

2Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To detemine the possible impact on hospital bed occupancy if a "rapid diagnosis and treatment centre" (RDTC) were operational; to determine the number of patients that such a unit should be able to a accomodate to avoid delays in transfer to this unit. Design: Retrospective review of accident and emergency (A&E) department notes from consecutive adults over a 16 day period. Setting: City centre teaching hospital with 1330 beds and 105 000 A&E new attendees per annum. Main outcome measure: Total number of be days saved per annum (and daily average, assuming no variation by season or day of the week) and the expected accupancy of the RDTC according to the time of day. Results: The expected daily bed saving was estimated to be 16. Average occupancy was expected to be between six and eight (with little diurnal variation) and a unit with 10 beds would be sufficently large to avoid delays for 85% of patients transferred there from A&E. Conclusions: On the basis of a "paper exercise" an RDTC would be expected to be beneficial in terms of bed utilisation; careful evaluation of the effect of such a unit in operation should be undertaken.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hardern, R. D., Taylor, A., Shelton, R., & Russell, A. (2004, March). Developing a rapid diagnosis and treatment centre: Estimating impact on hospital resources. Emergency Medicine Journal. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2003.012831

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free