The Comparison of Balloon versus Rotational Angioplasty (COBRA) study protocol: A prospective randomized study

4Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The Comparison of Balloon versus Rotational Angioplasty (COBRA) study is a prospective, randomized study to compare short- and long-term effects of PTCA and high speed PTCRA (or rotablation) in patients with complex coronary stenoses. Patients with angiographically defined complex coronary stenoses (> 70% diameter reduction) are included in the study. The trial has recruited 501 patients who will have detailed follow-up for 6 months. The primary end points are: (1) procedural success, defined as angiographically proven residual stenoses <50% and stenosis reduction of ≤ 20% in absence of new myocardial infarction, emergency CABG, or death: (2) 6-month restenosis in the treated segment; and (3) major cardiac events during the follow-up period. Additionally, improved exercise tolerance will be scored. The final results of the study are expected by late 1997.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Erbel, R., Dill, T., Peter, W., Weber, M. D., Liu, F., Küchler, R., … Hamm, C. W. (1997). The Comparison of Balloon versus Rotational Angioplasty (COBRA) study protocol: A prospective randomized study. Journal of Interventional Cardiology, 10(4), 271–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8183.1997.tb00041.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free