Effects of lightwand (Trachlight) compared with direct laryngoscopy on circulatory responses to tracheal intubation

78Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We compared the effects of the lightwand technique on circulatory responses to tracheal intubation with those of direct-vision laryngoscopy. Forty adult patients received propofol and vecuronium, and their lungs were ventilated for 2 min via a mask with 5% sevoflurane in oxygen, after which the trachea was intubated orally using either the lightwand (Trachlight, n = 20) or the Macintosh laryngoscope (n = 20). Maximum mean arterial pressure changes did not differ between groups during (lightwand group, 25 (SD 21) mm Hg vs laryngoscopy group, 23 (19) mm Hg) and after (21 (24) mm Hg vs 21 (16) mm Hg) tracheal intubation. Maximum heart rate changes were similar for groups during (16 (14) beat min-1 vs 16 (15) beat min-1) and after (2 (11) beat min-1 vs 7 (19) beat min-1) tracheal intubation. There were no differences between the lightwand technique and direct-vision laryngoscopy in changes in mean arterial pressure and heart rate during and after tracheal intubation. We conclude that the effects of the lightwand technique on circulatory responses to tracheal intubation were similar to those of direct-vision laryngoscopy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hirabayashi, Y., Hiruta, M., Kawakami, T., Inoue, S., Fukuda, H., Sattoh, K., & Shimizu, R. (1998). Effects of lightwand (Trachlight) compared with direct laryngoscopy on circulatory responses to tracheal intubation. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 81(2), 253–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/81.2.253

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free