Systematic review of ChatGPT accuracy and performance in Iran’s medical licensing exams: A brief report

5Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

ChatGPT has demonstrated significant potential in various aspects of medicine, including its performance on licensing examinations. In this study, we systematically investigated ChatGPT’s performance in Iranian medical exams and assessed the quality of the included studies using a previously published assessment checklist. The study found that ChatGPT achieved an accuracy range of 32–72% on basic science exams, 34–68.5% on pre‑internship exams, and 32–84% on residency exams. Notably, its performance was generally higher when the input was provided in English compared to Persian. One study reported a 40% accuracy rate on an endodontic board exam. To establish ChatGPT as a supplementary tool in medical education and clinical practice, we suggest that dedicated guidelines and checklists are needed to ensure high‑quality and consistent research in this emerging field.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Keshtkar, A., Atighi, F., & Reihani, H. (2024, November 1). Systematic review of ChatGPT accuracy and performance in Iran’s medical licensing exams: A brief report. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1210_24

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free