Influence of referral bias on the clinical characteristics of patients with Gram-negative bloodstream infection

37Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Referral bias can influence the results of studies performed at tertiary-care centres. In this study, we evaluated demographic and microbiological factors that influenced referral of patients with Gram-negative bloodstream infection (BSI). We identified 2919 and 846 unique patients with Gram-negative BSI in a referral cohort of patients treated at Mayo Clinic Hospitals and a population-based cohort of Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2007, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with referral. Elderly patients aged ≥80 years with Gram-negative BSI were less likely to be referred than younger patients [odds ratio (OR) 0·43, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0·30 - 0·62] as were females (OR 0·63, 95% CI 0·53 - 0·74). After adjusting for age and gender, bloodstream isolates of Escherichia coli (OR 0·50, 95% CI 0·43 - 0·58) and Proteus mirabilis (OR 0·49, 95% CI 0·30 - 0·82) were underrepresented in the referral cohort; and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (OR 2·26, 95% CI 1·70 - 3·06), Enterobacter cloacae (OR 2·31, 95% CI 1·53 - 3·66), Serratia marcescens (OR 2·34, 95% CI 1·33 - 4·52) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (OR 17·94, 95% CI 3·98 - 314·43) were overrepresented in the referral cohort. We demonstrated that demographic and microbiological characteristics of patients with Gram-negative BSI had an influence on referral patterns. These factors should be considered when interpreting results of investigations performed at tertiary-care centres. © Copyright Cambridge University Press 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al-Hasan, M. N., Eckel-Passow, J. E., & Baddour, L. M. (2011). Influence of referral bias on the clinical characteristics of patients with Gram-negative bloodstream infection. Epidemiology and Infection, 139(11), 1750–1756. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095026881100001X

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free