Development and evaluation of probabilistic forecasting methods for small area populations

2Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Planning and development decisions in both the government and business sectors often require small area population forecasts. Unfortunately, current methods often produce forecasts that are inaccurate, particularly for remote areas and those with smaller populations. Such inaccuracy necessitates the development and evaluation of methods to forecast and communicate forecast uncertainty, however, little research has been conducted in this domain for small area populations. In this paper, we evaluate a set of probabilistic forecasting methods which include Autoregressive integrated moving average, Exponential Smoothing, THETA, LightGBM and XGBOOST, to produce point forecasts and 80% prediction intervals for Australian SA2 small area populations. We also investigate methods to combine the intervals to produce ensemble forecasts. Our results show that individual probabilistic methods generally produce prediction intervals which underestimate forecast uncertainty. Combining forecasts improves the overall accuracy of point forecasts and the coverage of their intervals, however, coverage still tends to be less than the expected 80% for all but the most conservative combination method.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grossman, I., Bandara, K., Wilson, T., & Kirley, M. (2024). Development and evaluation of probabilistic forecasting methods for small area populations. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 51(2), 366–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083231178817

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free