Abstract
Aquifers are underground porous formations containing water. Confined aquifers are surrounded by impermeable layers on top and bottom, called cap rocks and bed rocks. A confined aquifer with a very low groundwater flow velocity was considered to meet the annual cooling and heating energy requirements of a residential building complex in Tehran, Iran. Three different alternatives of Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage (ATES) were employed to meet the heating/cooling demands of the buildings. These alternatives were using ATES for: Cooling alone, heating alone by coupling with at-plate solar collectors, and cooling and heating by coupling with a heat pump. For the economic evaluation of the alternatives, a life cycle cost analysis was employed. For the environmental evaluation, Ret Screen software was employed. For the considered 3 operational alternatives, using ATES for cooling alone had the minimum payback period time of 2.41 years and the life cycle cost of 16000 $. In the environmental perspective, among the 3 alternatives, coupling of ATES with heat pump for cooling and heating had the minimum CO2 generation, corresponding to 359 tons/year.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Ghaebi, H., Bahadori, M. N., & Saidi, M. H. (2017). Economic and environmental evaluation of different operation alternatives to aquifer thermal energy storage in Tehran, Iran. Scientia Iranica, 24(2), 610–623. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2017.4046
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.