Reversals and transpositions distance with proportion restriction

1Citations
Citations of this article
N/AReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the field of comparative genomics, one way of comparing two genomes is through the analysis of how they distinguish themselves based on a set of mutations called rearrangement events. When considering that genomes undergo different types of rearrangements, it can be assumed that some events are more common than others. To model this assumption, one can assign different weights to different events, where common events tend to cost less than others. However, this approach, called weighted, does not guarantee that the rearrangement assumed to be the most frequent will be also the most frequently returned by proposed algorithms. To overcome this issue, we investigate a new problem where we seek the shortest sequence of rearrangement events able to transform one genome into the other, with a restriction regarding the proportion between the events returned. Here, we consider two rearrangement events: reversal, that inverts the order and the orientation of the genes inside a segment of the genome, and transposition, that moves a segment of the genome to another position. We show the complexity of this problem for any desired proportion considering scenarios where the orientation of the genes is known or unknown. We also develop an approximation algorithm with a constant approximation factor for each scenario and, in particular, we describe an improved (asymptotic) approximation algorithm for the case where the gene orientation is known. At last, we present the experimental tests comparing the proposed algorithms with others from the literature for the version of the problem without the proportion restriction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brito, K. L., Alexandrino, A. O., Oliveira, A. R., Dias, U., & Dias, Z. (2021). Reversals and transpositions distance with proportion restriction. Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.1142/S021972002150013X

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free