CASE AND COMMENTARY: PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE SHOULD A PHYSICIAN EVER VIOLATE SWAT OR TEMS PROTOCOL IN A MASS CASUALTY INCIDENT?

1Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Mass casualty incidents involving active shooters are becoming more common, and many involve special weapons and tactics team responses. Standard of care is to have tactical emergency medical services paramedics or physicians direct triage and administer immediate interventions. In these situations, a clinical and ethical value is to do the greatest good for the greatest number of people. Cases in which beneficence and justice are at odds are particularly complex. This commentary on such a case argues that directing resources to patients most likely to survive accords triage principles and explores ethical complexity in resource allocation decisions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morshedi, B., & Mehkri, F. (2022). CASE AND COMMENTARY: PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE SHOULD A PHYSICIAN EVER VIOLATE SWAT OR TEMS PROTOCOL IN A MASS CASUALTY INCIDENT? AMA Journal of Ethics, 24(2), E120–E125. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2022.120

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free