Intraoperative graft flow profiles in coronary artery bypass surgery: A meta-analysis

18Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Conduits used in coronary artery bypass artery grafting (CABG) have different properties and flow profiles. We compared intraoperative mean graft flow (MGF) between arterial and venous conduits, off-pump CABG (OPCABG) and on-pump CABG (ONCABG) procedures, skeletonized and pedicled internal mammary artery (IMA) grafts, and pulsatility index (PI) between OPCABG and ONCABG, in pairwise meta-analyses. Methods: Following a systematic literature search, all studies comparing MGF in arterial and venous grafts, were included. The primary endpoint was comparison of pooled MGF between arterial and venous grafts. Secondary endpoints were comparisons of pooled MGF in OPCABG vs ONCABG, anastomosed skeletonized vs pedicled IMA grafts, free skeletonized vs pedicled IMA grafts and PI in OPCABG versus ONCABG. Results: A total of 25 studies with 4443 patients were included. Compared with venous grafts, arterial grafts had lower MGF (standardized mean difference [SMD], −0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI, −0.34; −0.22]; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Silva, M., Rong, L. Q., Naik, A., Rahouma, M., Hameed, I., Robinson, B., … Gaudino, M. (2020). Intraoperative graft flow profiles in coronary artery bypass surgery: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 35(2), 279–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.14359

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free