Liquidity and hedging effectiveness under futures mispricing: International evidence

14Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We analyze the hedging effectiveness of positions that replicate stock indexes using corresponding futures contracts through the application of a dynamic, stochastic hedging strategy proposed by Lafuente, J. A. and Novales, A. (2003). Conclusive gains do not emerge in any of the markets analyzed over the period considered, relative to the use of a constant unit hedge ratio. These findings are consistent with the trend observed in the IBEX 35 futures market study of Lafuente, J. A. and Novales, A. (2003). Our empirical evidence suggests that, contrary to what happens in less liquid markets, the discrepancy between theoretical and quoted prices in index futures contracts in fully developed markets does not represent a noise factor that can be successfully exploited for hedging. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Andani, A., Lafuente, J. A., & Novales, A. (2009). Liquidity and hedging effectiveness under futures mispricing: International evidence. Journal of Futures Markets, 29(11), 1050–1066. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.20395

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free