Abstract
This essay examines the use of famine-plot rhetoric in the course of disputes over free trade in the French Atlantic during the late eighteenth century. Seeking to discredit officially sanctioned trade monopolies, French plantation owners frequently suggested that the control exercised by metropolitan merchants over transatlantic commerce was responsible for food shortages among the enslaved population of the colonies. In reality, the planters themselves bore primary responsibility for malnutrition in the French Caribbean, thanks to their reliance on the slave trade and support for the expansion of plantation agriculture. While proponents of the colonial famine plot accepted that plantation slavery had made it impossible for the resources available in the colonies to sustain the growing enslaved population, they remained committed to the plantation system. In advocating expanded free trade as the best means to ensure the continued growth of the colonies, French planters anticipated a response to the environmental problems caused by colonial expansion that became increasingly prevalent among proponents of European imperialism during the nineteenth century. © 2010, Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis. All rights reserved.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Horan, J. (2010). The Colonial Famine Plot: Slavery, Free Trade, and Empire in the French Atlantic, 1763–1791. International Review of Social History, 55(S18), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859010000519
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.