A Systematic Review of the Performance Characteristics of Clinical Event Monitor Signals Used to Detect Adverse Drug Events in the Hospital Setting

70Citations
Citations of this article
91Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: We conducted a systematic review of pharmacy and laboratory signals used by clinical event monitor systems to detect adverse drug events (ADEs) in adult hospitals. Design and Measurements: We searched the MEDLINE, CINHAL, and EMBASE databases for the years 1985-2006, and found 12 studies describing 36 unique ADE signals (10 medication levels, 19 laboratory values, and 7 antidotes). We were able to calculate positive predictive values (PPVs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for 15 signals. Results: We found that PPVs ranged from 0.03 (95% CI, 0.03-0.03) for hypokalemia, to 0.50 (95% CI, 0.39-0.61) for supratherapeutic quinidine level. In general, antidotes (range = 0.09-0.11) had the lowest PPVs, followed by laboratory values (range = 0.03-0.27) and medication levels (range = 0.03-0.50). Conclusion: Data from this study should help clinical information system and computerized decision support producers develop or improve existing clinical event monitor systems to detect ADEs in their own hospitals by prioritizing those signals with the highest PPVs. © 2007 J Am Med Inform Assoc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Handler, S. M., Altman, R. L., Perera, S., Hanlon, J. T., Studenski, S. A., Bost, J. E., … Fridsma, D. B. (2007). A Systematic Review of the Performance Characteristics of Clinical Event Monitor Signals Used to Detect Adverse Drug Events in the Hospital Setting. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14(4), 451–458. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2369

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free