Abstract
The sixth sentence of the fourth paragraph in the Introduction should have cited references 25 and 28 instead of 18 and 20. The correct sentence should read: Nevertheless, these materials can still be examined by small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), but SAXS is a special technique with relatively limited accessibility and, moreover, does not provide the same information as regular XRD does and is instead rather used for nanoparticle size or pore size determinations [25, 28]. 25. Spieß L, Teichert G, Schwarzer R, Behnken H, Genzel C. Moderne Röntgenbeugung: Röntgendiffraktometrie für Materialwissenschaftler, Physiker und Chemiker. 2., überarb. und erw. Aufl. ed. Vieweg Teubner. 2009. 28. Sharma R, Bisen D, Shukla U, Sharma B. X-ray diffraction: a powerful method of characterizing nanomaterials. Recent Res Sci Technol. 2012. There is an error in reference 66. The correct reference is: Motz DA. Entwicklung von Referenzmaterialien für die Röntgen-Nahkanten-Absorptionsspektroskopie am Laboraufbau. Hannover: Institutionelles Repositorium der Leibniz Universität Hannover; 2021. https://doi.org/10.15488/10431
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Praetz, S., Schlesiger, C., Motz, D. A., Klimke, S., Jahns, M., Gottschalk, C., … Kanngießer, B. (2026, May 1). Correction: Can laboratory-based XAFS compete with XRD and Mössbauer spectroscopy as a tool for quantitative species analysis? Critical evaluation using the example of a natural iron ore (PLoS One. (2025) 20:5 (e0323678) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323678). PLOS ONE. Public Library of Science. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0350050
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.