Abstract
The case of intra-European movement raises significant debate about multi-level governance (MLG). In analytical terms, it asks how multi-level governance of intra-European movement actually is, what actors are involved and how? In normative terms, it considers whether intra-European movement can be seen as ‘successful’ multi-level governance. Intra-European movement is an area that faces both issue complexity and institutional complexity (Stephenson 2013, pp. 817) and as such, the governance arrangements are often correspondingly complex. This chapter will attempt to locate the case of intra-European movement within the broader literature on multi-level governance and try to draw out lessons for understanding MLG as a practical, analytical and normative concept. This is relevant to both the understanding of intra-European movement and the understanding of MLG. On the one hand, additional cases help to support or refute the robustness of our conceptualisation of multi-level governance; on the other hand, MLG as a concept can help us to understand the entanglement of a complex issue that cuts across political and policy bounds. The chapter will first develop a framework of multi-level governance that can be applied to intra-European movement. Then, the structural, relational and policy factors that affect MLG will be explored in the context of this specific case. The final section will try to craft some answers about what intra-European movement policy can tell us about multi-level governance, and vice versa.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Curry, D. (2018). Intra-European Movement: Multi-Level or Mismatched Governance? In IMISCOE Research Series (pp. 141–160). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77991-1_8
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.