Color diversity judgments in peripheral vision: Evidence against “cost-free” representations

6Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Is visual perception “rich” or “sparse?” One finding supporting the “rich” hypothesis shows that a specific visual summary representation, color diversity, is represented “cost-free” outside focally-attended regions in dual-task paradigms [1]. Here, we investigated whether this “cost-free” phenomenon for color diversity perception extends to peripheral vision. After replicating previous findings and verifying that color diversity is represented “cost-free” in central vision, we performed two experiments: in our first experiment, we extended the paradigm to peripheral vision and found that in minimally-attended regions of space, color diversity perception was impaired. In a second and final experiment, we added confidence judgments to our task, and found that participants maintained high levels of metacognitive awareness of impaired performance in minimally-attended visual areas in the periphery. These findings provide evidence that color perception may be partially attention-dependent in peripheral vision, and challenge previous views on both sides of the rich vs. sparse debate.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hawkins, B., Evans, D., Preston, A., Westmoreland, K., Mims, C. E., Lolo, K., … Odegaard, B. (2022). Color diversity judgments in peripheral vision: Evidence against “cost-free” representations. PLoS ONE, 17(12 December). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279686

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free