When to use which molecular prognostic scoring system in the management of patients with MDS?

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of hematopoietic cancers characterized by recurrent molecular alterations driving the disease pathogenesis with a variable propensity for progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Clinical decision making for MDS relies on appropriate risk stratification at diagnosis, with higher-risk patients requiring more intensive therapy. The conventional clinical prognostic systems including the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) and its revised version (IPSS-R) have dominated the risk stratification of MDS from 1997 until 2022. Concurrently, the use of next-generation sequencing has revolutionized the field by revealing multiple recurrent genetic mutations, which correlate with phenotype and prognosis. Significant efforts have been made to formally incorporate molecular data into prognostic tools to improve proper risk identification and personalize treatment strategies. In this review, we will critically compare the available molecular scoring systems for MDS focusing on areas of progress and potential limitations that can be improved in subsequent revisions of these tools.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kewan, T., Bewersdorf, J. P., Gurnari, C., Xie, Z., Stahl, M., & Zeidan, A. M. (2023, December 1). When to use which molecular prognostic scoring system in the management of patients with MDS? Best Practice and Research: Clinical Haematology. Bailliere Tindall Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beha.2023.101517

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free