KNOWLEDGE, SCIENCE AND DEATH: THE THEORY OF BRAIN-SIGN

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In today’s paradigmatic climate, the possibility of knowledge, and therefore science, still depends upon our being conscious. However, no scientifically accepted account of consciousness exists. In recent years I have developed the theory of brain-sign which replaces consciousness as a wholly physical neural condition. The first tenet is that the brain is a causal organ, not a knowledge organ. The second is that brain-sign, used in inter-neural communication for uncertain or imprecise collective action, derives at each moment from the causal orientation of the brain. Signs are ubiquitous bio-physical entities. Thus there is no problematic dualism, consciousness and world. We now have two accounts of the brain phenomenon. The first (consciousness) is an inexplicable physical anomaly. The second (brain-sign) belongs in the physical universe, and fulfils a crucial neurobiological function. With brain-sign theory we even ‘discover’ that we do not know we are alive or will die.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clapson, P. (2014). KNOWLEDGE, SCIENCE AND DEATH: THE THEORY OF BRAIN-SIGN. Activitas Nervosa Superior, 56(4), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03379615

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free