Alive or dead: Validity of the Social Security Administration Death Master File after 2011

31Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the reliability of the Social Security Death Master File (DMF) after the November 2011 changes limiting the inclusion of state records. Data Sources: Secondary data from the DMF, New York State (NYS) and New Jersey (NJ) Vital Statistics (VS), and institutional data warehouse. Study Design: Retrospective study. Two cohorts: discharge date before November 1, 2011, (pre-2011) or after (post-2011). Death in-hospital used as gold standard. NYS VS used for out-of-hospital death. Sensitivity, specificity, Cohen's Kappa, and 1-year survival calculated. Data Collection Methods: Patients matched to DMF using Social Security Number, or date of birth and Soundex algorithm. Patients matched to NY and NJ VS using probabilistic linking. Principal Findings: 97 069 patients January 2007-March 2016: 39 075 pre-2011; 57 994 post-2011. 3777 (3.9 percent) died in-hospital. DMF sensitivity for in-hospital death 88.9 percent (κ = 0.93) pre-2011 vs 14.8 percent (κ = 0.25) post-2011. DMF sensitivity for NY deaths 74.6 percent (κ = 0.71) pre-2011 vs 26.6 percent (κ = 0.33) post-2011. DMF sensitivity for NJ deaths 62.6 percent (κ = 0.64) pre-2011 vs 10.8 percent (κ = 0.15) post-2011. DMF sensitivity for out-of-hospital death 71.4 percent pre-2011 (κ = 0.58) vs 28.9 percent post-2011 (κ = 0.34). Post-2011, 1-year survival using DMF data was overestimated at 95.8 percent, vs 86.1 percent using NYS VS. Conclusions: The DMF is no longer a reliable source of death data. Researchers using the DMF may underestimate mortality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Levin, M. A., Lin, H. M., Prabakar, G., McCormick, P. J., & Egorova, N. N. (2019). Alive or dead: Validity of the Social Security Administration Death Master File after 2011. Health Services Research, 54(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13069

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free