Abstract
Objective - To compare urine pH of cats and dogs determined by use of a dipstrip and a pH meter. Design - Prospective study. Sample Population - 109 urine samples from 88 cats that were clinically normal or had signs of irritative urination, 52 samples from 13 clinically normal dogs, and 3 samples from 3 dogs with urinary tract infections. Procedure - Measurements of urine pH were obtained by use of a dipstrip and pH meter, and degree of agreement between measurements was evaluated. Results - Mean difference (± 2 SD) between the 2 methods was 0.1 ± 0.9 pH units. Only 65 of 164 (40%) samples measured by use of a dipstrip were within 0.25 pH units of results obtained by use of the pH meter. Clinical Implications - When an accurate measurement of urine pH is critical for clinical decision making, the measurement should be made by use of a pH meter. Dipstrips typically are not accurate enough to be clinically useful.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Heuter, K. J., Buffington, C. A. T., & Chew, D. J. (1998). Agreement between two methods for measuring urine pH in cats and dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 213(7), 996–998. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.1998.213.07.996
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.