Agreement between two methods for measuring urine pH in cats and dogs

25Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective - To compare urine pH of cats and dogs determined by use of a dipstrip and a pH meter. Design - Prospective study. Sample Population - 109 urine samples from 88 cats that were clinically normal or had signs of irritative urination, 52 samples from 13 clinically normal dogs, and 3 samples from 3 dogs with urinary tract infections. Procedure - Measurements of urine pH were obtained by use of a dipstrip and pH meter, and degree of agreement between measurements was evaluated. Results - Mean difference (± 2 SD) between the 2 methods was 0.1 ± 0.9 pH units. Only 65 of 164 (40%) samples measured by use of a dipstrip were within 0.25 pH units of results obtained by use of the pH meter. Clinical Implications - When an accurate measurement of urine pH is critical for clinical decision making, the measurement should be made by use of a pH meter. Dipstrips typically are not accurate enough to be clinically useful.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Heuter, K. J., Buffington, C. A. T., & Chew, D. J. (1998). Agreement between two methods for measuring urine pH in cats and dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 213(7), 996–998. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.1998.213.07.996

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free