Abstract
We describe a retrospective analysis of Brucella enzyme immunoassay (EIA) IgM and IgG results compared to those of the standard tube agglutination test (SAT). Among 1,091 samples tested, 104 (9.5%) and 24 (2.2%) sera were positive by IgM and IgG EIA, respectively. Supplemental testing by SAT showed that 82.7% (86/104) of IgM EIA-reactive samples and 54.2% (13/24) of IgG EIA-reactive samples were negative by SAT. Testing all EIA screen-reactive samples by SAT is required when evaluating patients for potential brucellosis. Due to the limitations of serology, culture remains the gold standard for detecting Brucella infection. Copyright © 2012, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Binnicker, M. J., Theel, E. S., Larsen, S. M., & Patel, R. (2012). A high percentage of serum samples that test reactive by enzyme immunoassay for anti-brucella antibodies are not confirmed by the standard tube agglutination test. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, 19(8), 1332–1334. https://doi.org/10.1128/CVI.00197-12
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.