A high percentage of serum samples that test reactive by enzyme immunoassay for anti-brucella antibodies are not confirmed by the standard tube agglutination test

8Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We describe a retrospective analysis of Brucella enzyme immunoassay (EIA) IgM and IgG results compared to those of the standard tube agglutination test (SAT). Among 1,091 samples tested, 104 (9.5%) and 24 (2.2%) sera were positive by IgM and IgG EIA, respectively. Supplemental testing by SAT showed that 82.7% (86/104) of IgM EIA-reactive samples and 54.2% (13/24) of IgG EIA-reactive samples were negative by SAT. Testing all EIA screen-reactive samples by SAT is required when evaluating patients for potential brucellosis. Due to the limitations of serology, culture remains the gold standard for detecting Brucella infection. Copyright © 2012, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Binnicker, M. J., Theel, E. S., Larsen, S. M., & Patel, R. (2012). A high percentage of serum samples that test reactive by enzyme immunoassay for anti-brucella antibodies are not confirmed by the standard tube agglutination test. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, 19(8), 1332–1334. https://doi.org/10.1128/CVI.00197-12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free