Person-oriented versus technique-oriented specialties: early preferences and eventual choice.

33Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Students' selection of a specialty is an important decision in their career as a physician. While distinguishing primary care physicians from non-primary care specialists has served a purpose for how medicine is practiced and managed, considering alternative ways of grouping specialties is appropriate when exploring specialty decisions. PURPOSE: This study explored how early specialty preferences correspond to eventual specialty choice using the person-oriented versus technique-oriented taxonomy. METHOD: Participants were 349 students who completed a career plan survey during the first semester of medical school and later graduated. RESULTS: Chi-square analysis showed a statistically significant difference between students' early preference for a person-oriented or technique-oriented specialty and the specialty they chose for their residency. CONCLUSION: Students with an early preference for person-oriented specialties were more likely to choose a person-oriented specialty, whereas students with an early preference for technique-oriented specialties were less likely to enter a technique-oriented specialty.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Manuel, R. S., Borges, N. J., & Jones, B. J. (2009). Person-oriented versus technique-oriented specialties: early preferences and eventual choice. Medical Education Online, 14, 4. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v14i.4504

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free