P2071Single- vs two- stenting technique with second generation drug eluting stent for unprotected left main coronary bifurcation disease: insights from FAILS-2 study

  • Pavani M
  • Conrotto F
  • Chieffo A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) bifurcation lesions with 1- or 2-stenting techniques in the second generation drug-eluting stents (2GDES) era. Background: In previous studies the 2-stenting technique for ULMCA bifurcation lesions showed worse clinical outcomes than the 1-stenting technique, even if no dedicated randomized trials are still available. Moreover there has been a paucity of data regarding comparison of 1 vs 2- stenting techniques with the use of 2GDES. Methods: The FAILS-2 was a retrospective multicentric registry enrolling consecutive patients that underwent ULMCA PCI with 2GDES implantation from 2007 to 2015 in 6 centers (Europe and Japan). Only patients treated for distal left main disease were included. The primary endpoint was the incidence of death and MACE (a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization and stent thrombosis) at long-term follow-up. In addition, we performed a propensity score adjusted for clinical outcomes. Results: Of the 1270 patients included in the FAILS-2 registry, 835 patients with distal ULMCA involvement (565 treated with 1-stent and 270 with 2-stent technique) represented our study population. During a medium follow-up of 2 years, all-cause death rate was not different between 1-S and 2-S groups, respectively 11,6% vs 10% (adjusted p=0,98); also MACE rates were similar among groups (24% vs 25% respectively, adjusted p=0,98). Although we showed only a trend to higher TLR in 2-S group, respectively 16,6% vs 12,3% (adjusted p=0,10), this was mainly due to an higher incidence of circumflex ostium restenosis (4% in 1-S vs 12% in 2-S groups, adjusted p=0,048). Conclusions: Two-stenting technique using second generation DES for left main coronary bifurcation disease showed similar long-term clinical outcomes, but higher circumflex ostium in-stent restenosis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pavani, M., Conrotto, F., Chieffo, A., Kawamoto, H., D’Ascenzo, F., Cerrato, E., … Escaned, J. (2017). P2071Single- vs two- stenting technique with second generation drug eluting stent for unprotected left main coronary bifurcation disease: insights from FAILS-2 study. European Heart Journal, 38(suppl_1). https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx502.p2071

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free