Impact of early life nutrition on growth and intestinal microflora composition in low-birth-weight infants

1Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We investigated the effect of early life nutrition on growth and intestinal microflora in low-birth-weight infants. Eleven preterm newborns (birth weight 1456 ± 293 g, gestational age 30.6 ± 1.2 weeks) received special preterm infant formula as a sole diet from the first enteral feeding until the end of the second month of life (preterm infant formula group (PF group)). Thirteen infants (birth weight 1728 ± 276 g; gestational age 32.6 ± 1.4 weeks) received standard casein-dominant infant formulas available in Estonia (standard formula group (SF group)). Growth parameters were measured at the age of 1, 2, 3, 4 weeks and 2 months. Faecal samples for short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and bacterial cultures were collected at the age of 6 days and 2 months. Two results have been received: better growth and better microbial colonization in the group of preterm infant formula. There was significantly higher weight gain in the PF group at the age of 2 months (1814 ± 566 g) than in the SF group (1255 ± 365 g). The relative amount of coagulase negative staphylococci was significantly higher in the SF group at the age of 6 days in comparison with the PF group. At the age of 6 days the prevalence of faecal acetic acid was 98% of total concentration of short chain fatty acids in the PF group and 87% in the SF group (p < 0.05), which shows the higher prevalence of anaerobic microbes in the PF group. Thus, a nutrient-enriched preterm formula has a positive effect on the intestinal bacterial colonization and growth of low-birth-weight infants.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ormisson, A., Sepp, E., Siigur, U., Varendi, H., & Mikelsaar, M. (1997). Impact of early life nutrition on growth and intestinal microflora composition in low-birth-weight infants. Scandinavian Journal of Nutrition/Naringsforskning, 41(2), 71–74. https://doi.org/10.3402/fnr.v41i0.1750

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free