Impact of visit-to-visit fasting plasma glucose variability on the development of type 2 diabetes: A nationwide population-based cohort study

50Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Although increasing evidence suggests the association between short-term variability of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and diabetic complications or mortality, the impact of visit-to-visit variability of FPG on the development of type 2 diabetes (T2D) has not been evaluated. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Our analysis included 131,744 Korean men and women without diabetes using the Korean National Health Insurance System cohort with periodic health examination program. FPG variability was calculated using the coefficient of variation (FPG-CV), SD (FPG-SD), and variability independent of the mean (FPG-VIM). RESULTS During the median follow-up time of 8.3 years, Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated lower disease-free probability in the higher FPG variability group compared with the lower FPG variability group. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis exhibited that the hazard ratio for incident T2D was 1.67 (95% CI 1.58-1.77, P < 0.001) in the highest quartile of FPG-CV compared with the lowest quartile of FPG-CV after adjusting for confounding variables, including mean FPG. The association between FPG variability and the risk of T2D was consistent when modeling using FPG-SD and FPG-VIM in both normal and impaired fasting glucose groups. A 1 SD increase in the FPG-CV was associated with a 24% increased risk of T2D in the fully adjusted model. CONCLUSIONS Increased variability of FPG is associated with the development of T2D independently of diverse risk factors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, J. A., Lee, J. S., Chung, H. S., Roh, E., Lee, Y. B., Hong, S. H., … Choi, K. M. (2018). Impact of visit-to-visit fasting plasma glucose variability on the development of type 2 diabetes: A nationwide population-based cohort study. Diabetes Care, 41(12), 2610–2616. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-0802

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free