Push enteroscopy has a 96% cecal intubation rate in colonoscopies that failed because of redundant colons

5Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Performing a complete colonoscopy to the cecum is important for ruling out malignancy and other lesions, but failure rates are significant with a standard colonoscope. A previous study using a push enteroscope for failed colonoscopies had a completion rate of 68.7%. Objective: To improve the cecal intubation rate by using a newer version of a push enteroscope. Design: Retrospective study at first, then a prospective study. Setting: Single-center veterans health care system. Patients: A total of 47 patients in whom the cecum was not reached with a regular adult colonoscope between January 2007 and December 2010 were included. Those with poor bowel preparation were excluded. Interventions: Repeat colonoscopy using a new version of a push enteroscope. Main Outcome Measurements: The rate of cecal intubation and additional pathological findings. Results: The cecum or terminal ileum was reached in 45 patients (96%). Additional significant pathological findings in the previously unexamined colon were seen in 18 patients (38%). Limitations: Small sample size, lack of comparison with other endoscopes. Conclusions: Colonoscopy with a push enteroscope could be advanced to either the terminal ileum or cecum in 96% of patients, which is one of the highest known completion rates in patients in whom colonoscopy failed. Clinical management changed in all patients with additional findings. © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jackson, C. S., Haq, T., & Olafsson, S. (2011). Push enteroscopy has a 96% cecal intubation rate in colonoscopies that failed because of redundant colons. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 74(2), 341–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free