Efavirenz outperforms boosted atazanavir among treatment-naive HIV-1-infected persons in routine clinical care

7Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in a routine clinical care may result different from the clinical trials. We assessed the virologic outcomes in treatment-naive persons who received either efavirenz (EFV) or atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) with a backbone of tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) as their combination ART (cART). Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at the Washington University HIV Outpatient Clinic from January 2004 to June 2009. Predictors of virologic suppression (HIV RNA level <400 copies/mL) by week 48 were assessed by multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: Of 324 persons, 221(68%) received EFV and 103 (32%) received ATV/r. Persons on EFV had 1.4-fold increased likelihood of virologic suppression (95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.8) when compared to ATV/r after adjustment with primary drug resistance, pre-cART opportunistic infection, HIV RNA levels, and timing to start cART. Conclusions: In routine clinical care settings, EFV had higher likelihood of achieving virologic suppression than ATV/r with backbone of TDF/FTC. © 2012 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Taniguchi, T., Grubb, J. R., Nurutdinova, D., Önen, N. F., Shacham, E., Donovan, M., & Overton, E. T. (2013). Efavirenz outperforms boosted atazanavir among treatment-naive HIV-1-infected persons in routine clinical care. Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care, 12(2), 138–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545109712467057

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free