Thinking beyond means-ends analysis: The role of impulse-driven human creativity in the design of artificially intelligent systems

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

While goal-directed problem solving as advocated by Herbert Simon's means-ends analysis model has primarily shaped the course of design research on artificially intelligent systems, we contend that there is a definite disregard of a key phase within the overall design process that in fact logically precedes the problem-solving phase. While the systems designers have been obsessed with goal-directed problem solving, the basic determinants of the desired goal state remain to be fully understood or categorically defined. We propose an argumentative framework built on a set of logically interlinked conjectures that seeks to specifically highlight the importance of this hitherto neglected phase in the overall design process of intelligent systems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xu, D., Wang, Y., & Bhattacharya, S. (2010). Thinking beyond means-ends analysis: The role of impulse-driven human creativity in the design of artificially intelligent systems. In Information Systems Foundations: The Role of Design Science (pp. 213–232). ANU E Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/isf.12.2010.10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free