Animal welfare accreditation called into question

  • Grimm D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

PETA study finds violations more often in approved labs.Today, more than 900 institutions in 38 countries have earned accreditation by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC) International, including the top 100 National Institutes of Health–funded labs and all major pharmaceutical companies. But an analysis conducted by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals finds that laboratories that are accredited by AAALAC violate national animal welfare guidelines more frequently than do unaccredited facilities. Though AAALAC contends the study is based on biased data collected by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the findings may force a rethink of how lab animal welfare is overseen in the United States and other countries.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grimm, D. (2014). Animal welfare accreditation called into question. Science, 345(6200), 988–988. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.345.6200.988

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free