Analyzing Multiple Outcomes: Is it Really Worth the use of Multivariate Linear Regression?

  • Oliveira R
  • Teixeira-Pinto A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In health related research it is common to have multiple outcomes of interest in a single study. These outcomes are often analysed separately, ignoring the correlation between them. One would expect that a multivariate approach would be a more efficient alternative to individual analyses of each outcome. Surprisingly, this is not always the case. In this article we discuss different settings of linear models and compare the multivariate and univariate approaches. We show that for linear regression models, the estimates of the regression parameters associated with covariates that are shared across the outcomes are the same for the multivariate and univariate models while for outcome-specific covariates the multivariate model performs better in terms of efficiency.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oliveira, R., & Teixeira-Pinto, A. (2015). Analyzing Multiple Outcomes: Is it Really Worth the use of Multivariate Linear Regression? Journal of Biometrics & Biostatistics, 06(04). https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6180.1000256

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free