Carole Pateman y la crítica feminista a la teoría clásica de la democracia (Locke y Rousseau)

2Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The present work is based on the assumption that the non-insertion of women in the political arena - a recent fact, 20th century - occurred not in spite of democratic thought, but because the democratic theory was based in that exclusion of women in the public space. This assumption is a product of the critical gaze that feminism has made to the classic theories of democracy, specifically, to the social contract. In this framework, Carole Pateman is an author of the highest relevance, since her criticism is based on the deconstruction of classic speeches about democracy, and not from outside. The present paper makes a follow-up of Pateman's main ideas in her book The Disorder of Women, around two classics of the social contract, Rousseau and Locke, about essential issues, to understand the exclusion of women from the political arena: the social contract, the public sphere and their subjects, the citizens. To do this, we will be based on other authors, such as Mary Wollstonecraft, cited by Pateman in that book, and C.B. MacPherson, a theorist and critic of the liberal thought and modern democracy. © 2014 by Revista Estudos Feministas.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

del Águila, A. (2014). Carole Pateman y la crítica feminista a la teoría clásica de la democracia (Locke y Rousseau). Revista Estudos Feministas, 22(2), 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-026X2014000200003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free