Labor Market Duality in Korea

  • Schauer J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Description based upon print version of record. Labor market duality is a complex and critical issue for many countries that can lower productivity, contribute to inequality and result in negative externalities. In this paper, I study duality in the Korean labor market and analyze its sources and potential policy options. I find that employment protection legislations and large productivity differentials are the key drivers of Korea's duality. In addition, applying a general equilibrium search-and-matching model and calibrating it to the Korean economy, I show that well-calibrated flexicurity policies can significantly reduce duality and inequality and raise welfare and productivity. Notably, the introduction of all three pillars-flexiblity, a strong safety net and active labor market policies-is critical for its success. If only one pillar is introduced it can result in negative side-effects and might not reduce duality. Cover; Contents; Abstract; I. Introduction; II. How Has Duality Evolved in Korea? What is Its Current State?; III. What is the Impact of Labor Market Duality in Korea?; IV. What Explains Labor Market Duality in Korea?; V. How Can Policy Address Labor Market Duality?; A. What is Flexicurity and When Does it Work?; B. A Model of Labor Market Duality; C. Calibration to the Korean Economy; D. Putting Flexicurity to the Test; VI. Conclusion; References; Tables; 1. Inequality by Employment Status; 2. Flow Probability by Employment Status (2013-14); 3. Regression on Number of On-the-Job Trainings 4. Wages and Working Conditions by Firm Size and Employment Type5. Parameters for Calibration; 6. Moments for Calibration; 7. Policy Experiments; Figures; 1. Non-Regular Employment; 2. Employment by Status; 3. Employment by Type; 4. Employment by Gender; 5. Employment by Age and Highest Education Level; 6. Employment by Sector; 7. Employment by Firm Size; 8. Relative Wage of Non-Regular Employment Types; 9. Social Coverage by Employment Type; 10. Income Distribution by Employment Status; 11. Separation and Layoff Rates; 12. Private Spending on Education 13. Dismissal Regulation for Regular Workers14. Severance Pay for Redundancy Dismissal; 15. Relative Labor Productivity; 16. Relative Wages in Services by Employment Type; 17. Union Density; 18. Trade Union Density by Employment Type; 19. Changes in Employment Shares by Wage Level; 20. Wages by Wage Level; 21. Net Replacement Rate; 22. Strictness of Employment Protection; 23. Spending on Active Labor Market Policies; 24. ALMP Spending by Type of Program; 25. Tax Wedge; 26. Severance Pay Schedule and Firing Cost; 27. Share of Job-Destruction by Tenure; 28. Wage by Tenure 29. Share of Job Destruction by Tenure30. Income Change by Quintile (Firing Cost); 31. Welfare Change by Quintile (Firing Cost); 32. Share of Job-Destruction by Tenure; 33. Income Change by Quintile; 34. Welfare Change by Quintile; Boxes; 1. Korea-Key Labor Market Reforms; 2. Women, Elderly and Youth-Why Does Non-Regular Work Affect Them Disproportionately?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schauer, J. (2018). Labor Market Duality in Korea. IMF Working Papers, 18(126), 1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484357934.001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free