A novel inpatient PA staffing model for a community hospital

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: We sought to create a novel physician assistant (PA) and physician hospital medicine co-management strategy, employing a 3:1 PA:physician structure, under which the physician oversees all PA patients, but without a separate independent panel. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort pre-post design, comparing metrics for a traditional physician-only hospitalist model with a PA-physician team model. Outcomes included length of stay (LOS), readmissions, discharge destination, patient satisfaction, and in-hospital mortality. Results: LOS for patients under the PA-physician model (74 hours) was lower than for the physician-only model (83 hours; P < .001). The PA-physician model team discharged more patients home than to another facility (PA-physician 77.6%, physician-only 74.3%; P = .03). Thirty-day readmissions were about 10% (P = .97) and patients reported respectful treatment in about 80% (P = .53) of cases in each cohort. Conclusions: Our 3:1 PA-physician model team showed equal to superior outcomes compared with the physician-only hospitalist model.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bendicksen, D., Pflugeisen, C. M., & van Slot, F. (2022). A novel inpatient PA staffing model for a community hospital. Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants, 35(1), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JAA.0000795020.20041.2e

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free