Polarized platforms? How partisanship shapes perceptions of “algorithmic news bias”

30Citations
Citations of this article
112Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The use of artificial intelligence-based algorithms for the curation of news content by social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter has upended the gatekeeping role long held by traditional news outlets. This has caused some US policymakers to argue that platforms are skewing news diets against them, and such claims are beginning to take hold among some voters. In a nationally representative survey experiment, we explore whether traditional models of media bias perceptions extend to beliefs about algorithmic news bias. We find that partisan cues effectively shape individuals’ attitudes about algorithmic news bias but have asymmetrical effects. Specifically, whereas in-group directional partisan cues stimulate bias perceptions for members of both parties, Democrats, but not Republicans, also respond to out-group cues. We conclude with a discussion about the implications for the formation of attitudes about new technologies and the potential for polarization.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Calice, M. N., Bao, L., Freiling, I., Howell, E., Xenos, M. A., Yang, S., … Scheufele, D. A. (2023). Polarized platforms? How partisanship shapes perceptions of “algorithmic news bias.” New Media and Society, 25(11), 2833–2854. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211034159

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free