Individualised or Standardised Outcome Measures: A Co-habitation?

37Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Mental health outcome measurement is conflicted between two different schools of thought which underlie the division between standardised (nomothetic) and individualised or patient-generated (idiographic) measures. The underpinning philosophies of both approaches have very different starting points in terms of how we understand the world. And yet the strengths of both may contribute something useful for patients and mental health services. We suggest a convergence of approaches with new thinking on options for co-habitation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ashworth, M., Guerra, D., & Kordowicz, M. (2019). Individualised or Standardised Outcome Measures: A Co-habitation? Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 46(4), 425–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-019-00928-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free