Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of combination antiemetic prophylaxis for day-case gynaecological laparoscopic surgery

44Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In a randomized, double-blind trial, we compared i.v. ondansetron 4 mg (control), i.v. ondansetron 4 mg and cyclizine 50 mg (combination) and i.v. saline 0.9% (placebo), given after induction of standardized anaesthesia, for the prevention of nausea and vomiting (PONV) after day-case gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Compared with placebo, fewer patients in the control group vomited (9/20 versus 11/59, P=0.02) or needed rescue antiemetic (7/20 versus 9/59, P=0.06) before discharge. Compared with the control, fewer patients in the combination group (n=60) vomited (11/59 versus 2/60, P=0.01) or needed rescue antiemetic (29/59 versus 2/60, P=0.03) before discharge. The incidence of vomiting in the combination group was less than 5% overall. Compared with the control, the combination group had a significantly lower incidence (P=0.001) and severity (P<0.001) of nausea after discharge and more patients with no PONV at any time during the study (15/59 versus 27/60, P=0.03). Unlike the placebo and control groups, no patient receiving combination prophylaxis was admitted overnight for PONV management.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ahmed, A. B., Hobbs, G. J., & Curran, J. P. (2000). Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of combination antiemetic prophylaxis for day-case gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 85(5), 678–682. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/85.5.678

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free