A modified nominal group technique (mngt)-finding priorities in research

12Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to describe a modified nominal group technique (mNGT) approach to assess community health priorities and its application to a childhood obesity prevention project conducted with the high school population. Methods: This manuscript provides detailed information of a mNGT separately conducted with 3 cohorts, (students, teachers/administration, parents). Participants used a response sheet to brainstorm, document top 5 responses, and rank each response individually. We also used a unique reverse scoring method to quantify the qualitative data and within and between group scores for comparison against other cohorts. Summaries provided additional insight into the participants' perceptions. Results: The mNGT process successfully reduced limitations common to the traditional nominal group technique by providing an in-depth understanding of perceptions and understanding priorities. Conclusions: MNGT can be useful across other disciplines as a method of gathering rich qualitative feedback that can be transformed into a more quantitative form for analysis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wiggins, S. T., Colby, S., Moret, L., McElrone, M., Olfert, M. D., Riggsbee, K., … Kidd, T. (2020). A modified nominal group technique (mngt)-finding priorities in research. American Journal of Health Behavior, 44(3), 345–352. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.44.3.7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free