Abstract
In order to establish a search asymmetry, one must run an experiment with a symmetric design and get asymmetric results. Given an asymmetric design, one expects asymmetric results, and such results do not imply an asymmetry in the search mechanisms. In this paper, I argue that a number of experiments purporting to show search asymmetries contain built-in design asymmetries. A saliency model of visual search predicts the results of these experiments, using only a simple measure of target-distractor similarity, without reliance on asymmetric search mechanisms. These results have implications for search mechanisms and for other experiments purporting to show search asymmetries.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Rosenholtz, R. (2001). Search asymmetries? What search asymmetries? Perception and Psychophysics, 63(3), 476–489. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194414
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.