Laparoscopic extravesical vesicovaginal fistula repair: our technique and 15-year experience

46Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Two types of laparoscopic vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) repairs, the traditional transvesical (O’Conor) and extravesical techniques, dominate the literature. We present our 15-year experience of primary and recurrent cases of VVF utilizing an extravesical technique, which we first described in 1999. Methods: An IRB approved retrospective study revealed 44 female patients with either primary or recurrent VVF. Laparoscopic extravesical repair was performed without an omental flap in the majority of cases. A three-layer closure technique was performed utilizing a double-layer bladder closure and a single-layer vaginal closure followed by bladder testing. A suprapubic catheter was utilized for 2–3 weeks postoperatively for bladder decompression. Results: A review of our experience reveals a 97 % (32 out of 33) cure for primary VVF and 100 % (11 out of 11) rate for recurrent fistulas, with an overall cure rate of 98 % (43 out of 44) at a mean follow-up of 17.3 months (range 3–64). An omental flap was not utilized in 98 % of patients (43 out of 44), with a success rate of 98 % (42 out of 43). The mean estimated blood loss was 39 mL (range 0–450), mean hospital stay was 1.1 days (range 1–3), and none of the patients suffered any major intra- or postoperative complications. None of the patients required a conversion to open laparotomy. Conclusions: Based upon our experience we believe that performing laparoscopic extravesical VVF repair using a three-layer closure technique without an interposition omentum is a safe, effective, minimally invasive technique with excellent cure rates in an experienced surgeon’s hands.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miklos, J. R., & Moore, R. D. (2015). Laparoscopic extravesical vesicovaginal fistula repair: our technique and 15-year experience. International Urogynecology Journal, 26(3), 441–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2458-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free