Institutional investors, earnings management and mispricing of accruals: Evidence from China

4Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study examines the role of institutional investors in the pricing of normal accruals and discretionary accruals using the firms listed in the Chinese A-share Market. The results show that significant overpricing of discretionary accruals exists for individual investors and institutional investors, suggesting that they are both misled by the earnings management, while institutional investors are associated with significantly less overpricing. With respect to normal accruals, we find there is no evidence that institutional investors misprice normal accruals, while the individual investors overprice normal accruals. Our results suggest that institutional investors' superiority in mitigating the mispricing of total accruals is mainly due to their accurate pricing of normal accruals, and the reason why institutional investors cannot fully eliminate mispricing of accruals is that they are partly misled by earnings management. © 2013 The Clute Institute.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zeng, Z., Ou, P., & Li, B. (2013). Institutional investors, earnings management and mispricing of accruals: Evidence from China. Journal of Applied Business Research, 29(1), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v29i1.7573

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free