Erratum: MultipleTesting.com: A tool for life science researchers for multiple hypothesis testing correction (PLoS ONE (2021) 16:6 (e0245824) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245824)

6Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

After the publication of this article [1] it was noticed that in the Sequential methods for multiple-testing correction subsection of the Introduction, the description of the Hochberg-correction contains an error. The correct paragraph is: The Hochberg-correction, also called the step-up method, is based on a reverse scenario when the largest p-value is examined first. Once a significant p-value is identified, all the remaining smaller p-values would be declared significant (13). For example, if n = 500, the largest p-values are 0.3, 0.05, 0.01, and α = 0.05, the following adjustments are concluded: Rank#1: 0.3 * 1 = 0.3, 0.3 > 0.05, the test is not significant Rank#2: 0.05 * 2 = 0.1, 0.1 > 0.05, the test is not significant Rank#3: 0.01 * 3 = 0.03, 0.03 < 0.05, the test is significant, reject the hull hypothesis, and all of the remaining p-values will be significant after correction. The authors have stated that the online tool developed for multiple hypothesis testing corrections at www.multipletesting.com employs the correct Hochberg step-up algorithm.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Menyhart, O., Weltz, B., & Győrffy, B. (2022, September 1). Erratum: MultipleTesting.com: A tool for life science researchers for multiple hypothesis testing correction (PLoS ONE (2021) 16:6 (e0245824) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245824). PLoS ONE. Public Library of Science. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274662

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free