Defibrillation Testing During Implantation of Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

9Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Defibrillation testing (DT) remains recommended during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation due to limited supporting evidence. Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term impact of DT during S-ICD implantation. Methods: The HONEST (coHOrte fraNcaise des dEfibrillateurs Sous cuTanés) study is a nationwide, ongoing observational study, including all S-ICD recipients in France (2012-2019). Five-year endpoints were centrally adjudicated, and propensity score–weighted analyses compared outcomes by DT status. Results: Among 4,924 patients, DT was performed in 4,066 (82.6%), decreasing from 85.4% (2012-2014) to 66.9% in 2019 (P < 0.001). Nontested patients were older (51.2 vs 49.6 years; P = 0.007), had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (37.6% vs 43.3%; P < 0.001), and were more frequently implanted for primary prevention (68.0% vs 62.4%; P = 0.002) and structural heart disease (84.9% vs 76.8%; P < 0.001). DT-related complications occurred in 0.1%, including 2 deaths. Failure rate was 1.0%, with 87.8% undergoing corrective reinterventions. Independent predictors of DT failure were elevated shock impedance (≥89 Ω; OR: 4.60; 95% CI: 2.32-9.66; P < 0.001) and obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2; OR: 2.17; 95% CI: 1.01-4.55; P = 0.007). After adjustment, DT omission was not associated with increased risks of overall mortality (HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.86-1.61; P = 0.313), cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.70-1.56; P = 0.846), sudden cardiac death (HR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.04-1.72; P = 0.167), and appropriate (HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.78-1.30; P = 0.945) or inappropriate shocks (HR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.78-1.23; P = 0.865). Combined rates of ineffective shocks or undetected ventricular arrhythmias were similar (0.05 vs 0.06 per 100 person-years). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that DT can be safely omitted in the majority of S-ICD recipients, whereas selective DT may be considered in higher-risk subgroups. (S-ICD French Cohort Study (HONEST); NCT05302115)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kerkouri, F., Eschalier, R., Fareh, S., Marquié, C., Ait Said, M., Amara, W., … Marijon, E. (2025). Defibrillation Testing During Implantation of Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 86(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.04.048

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free