Comparison of energy flow stream and isentropic method for steam turbine energy analysis

13Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, a comparison of two different methods for a steam turbine energy analysis is presented. A high-pressure steam turbine from a supercritical thermal power plant (HPT) was analysed at three different turbine loads using the energy flow stream (EFS) method and isentropic (IS) method. The EFS method is based on steam turbine input and output energy flow streams and on the real steam turbine produced power. The method is highly dependable on the steam mass flow rate lost through the turbine gland seals. The IS method is based on a comparison of turbine steam expansion processes. Observed energy analysis methods cannot be directly compared because they are based on different sources of steam turbine energy losses, so, an overall steam turbine energy analysis is presented. Unlike most steam turbines from the literature, the analysed HPT did not have the highest overall energy efficiency at a full load due to exceeding the water/steam critical pressure at the turbine inlet during such operation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blažević, S., Mrzljak, V., Anđelić, N., & Car, Z. (2019). Comparison of energy flow stream and isentropic method for steam turbine energy analysis. Acta Polytechnica, 59(2), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.14311/AP.2019.59.0109

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free