Olanzapine in practice: A prospective naturalistic study

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims and method. The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the naturalistic use of olanzapine. Prescribers of olanzapine were asked to provide baseline and six-week Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale scores for 56 in-patients. Withdrawals from treatment were also noted. Results. Olanzapine was not effective in any of the 12 patients with refractory schizophrenia and four patients worsened. In 36 patients with non-refractory schizophrenia, 16 (44%) improved and 10 (28%) were categorised as treatment failures. Of eight patients with non-schizophrenic psychosis, only one improved and two were treatment failures. Clinical implications. Olanzapine is effective in treating non-refractory schizophrenia, but appears to have no beneficial effect in refractory schizophrenia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Taylor, D., Mir, S., & Mace, S. (1999). Olanzapine in practice: A prospective naturalistic study. Psychiatric Bulletin, 23(3), 178–180. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.23.3.178

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free